JIMMY
...g my opinion as to the standard of the webpage. This is also a technique which allows me to give an evaluated opinion regarding any analysed information. Q1. From a scale ranging from one (1) for most easiest to five (5) for least easiest, how would you rate the format of the material provided in terms of ease of accessibility? A1. I would give a rating of 2, as there were no complications in the layout, and the format of the unit which I chose allowed me to obtain an overview of the whole web page, and easily access the relevant sections without any problems. Q2. Did you choose this specific unit as a direct result of it display characteristics? Or was there another reason for your decision, if so elaborate A2. Of the three units I viewed, I believed this would be the easiest to navigate through because at first glance, it was obvious to me that the layout of links and resources was in such a manner that would enable an easy tour of the webpage. Furthermore, the layout I believed was the most simplistic; something which I believe is useful when presenting specifically require information. Q3 which format did u believe was the best for remembering presented information? Text, graphic or other A3. I chose the specific CCSR unit for the key reason of its simplistic layout, and this is something which drew me to the unit throughout its evaluating. For me it wasn’t a case of choosing the unit which had the best graphical detail or any specific presented information. I find it easier when information is to the point and clear, both these requirements were fulfilled by this webpage thus deeming it effective in presenting information which is easy to remember and recall at a later date. Q4 Did you find the links provided useful? Expand on any ideas...