Is the only responsibility of corporate executives, provided they stay within the law, to make as much money as possible for their companies?
...e attention to the environment problems, considering more deliberatly the consequence of large-scale production. If the irresponsible behavior do harm to the interests of others, there are no corporations willing to cooperate with such selfish units. In order to gain perfect cooperation with other unit and make more pofits from global market, they are unable to discard the social responsibility. In some sense, social obligation can help corporates to gain reputations and then become even more successful because of their contribution to the community. A respectable corporate often brings jobs and related economics to the general public at the same time when the corporate makes great profits. As for this both-sides win (Ë«Ó®), M.c.donld gives every corpotate a good example, that while they earn good money in the global market, they order only the beef, chicken and pork which do not contain antibiotics which is used to speed up the growth of domestic animals and in some degree will do harm to the health to people. This kind of the reverend commercial decision must bring both the esteem and profit to M.C. donald. This example illustrates that respecting the social obligation sometimes does not confict with the goal of making money. There are, however, some cases that making profits conflicts with social responsibility. For example, the chemical industry has to assume the expenditure to deal with the toxin trash(Óж¾·ÏÁÏ) , and the profit will be negatively influenced by doing so. These corporate favors the inexpensive program to restor...