Evolution
...0 randomly ratios to one in 1040,000, an “outrageous possibility” according to Hoyle, “that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted of “organic soup”. The chances of DNA are no less staggering. The probability of forming even the simplest of it’s histones reaches 20100, a number larger than the total of all the atoms in all the stars and galaxies visible in the largest astronomical telescopes. The second of these key elements lies in the evolutionist’s belief that man descended from ape-like ancestors. In his book, “The Mismeasure of Man,” Gould notes, “We have no evidence of biological change in brain size and structure since Homo sapiens appeared on the fossil record some fifty thousand years ago.” Thus “Newsweek” observes, “The missing link between man and the apes is merely the most glamorous of a whole hierarchy of phantom creatures. In the fossil record missing links are the rule.” To supply these missing links man has often been associated with ancient mammals such as the shrewlike, quadraped rodent and the Aegyptopithecus who bear both no genetic links to each other or to the successors in the evolutionary lineup. Deceptions such as the Piltdown man (a composition of human skull and orangutan jaw and teeth), the Ramapithecus (which was declared an ancestor based only on fragments of upper and lower jaws plus a collection of teeth, but was later proved to resemble the ape family), and the Australopiceus skull (which some scientists agree to be overwhelming simian), have become very prevalent, and according to English author Malcom Muggeride a “slipshod and unconvincing theorizing,” that “so easily captivated twentieth century minds and been so recklessly applied.” Another important factor in evolutionary controversy is the huge and substantial gulfs in the evolutionary chain. This theory presumes that fish became amphibians, some amphibians became reptiles, from the reptiles came both mammals and birds and eventually some mammals became men. However, in order for a fish to become a amphibian the backbone had to undergo some major modifications, the gills must change to lungs, and a pelvis had to be added, although no fossil fish is known to illustrate this. Likewise, amphibians and reptiles, reptiles and birds, and reptiles and mammals, similar monumental changes had to be adopted such as the shelled egg, internal fertilization, change in body temperature, skeleton changes, continuos air circulation, extra heart chambers, mammary glands, the Corti organ with it’s 20,000 rods and 3...