Cloning
...er again, thousands upon thousands of identical copies. Scientist would like to create a creature which is absolutely resistant to any diseases. Everything finds a way to adapt to its environment and if the benefits major benefit for cloning is to cure diseases, than we are at a loss. The fight for life “survival of the fittest” can sum it up. If we result to cloning as a means for reproduction, than who is to say that our bodies might not adapt to this, only allowing for this type of reproduction? Only than will me realize that in our affort to gain knowledge and power over every other living thing, did we fail. Everything on this earth has to be in perfect balance, and when we continue to tamper with Mother Nature, she finds a way to fight back. If something is pushed hard enough (in this case Nature), it will push back. We need to take things as they are given to us, the good and the bad. When we try to beat the odd, sometimes the odds beat us. From the point of view of ethics, cloning would eliminate the uniqueness that each one of us posses. Thus, leading to creation of genetically engineered groups of people for specific purposes and, chances are, that those individuals would be regarded as ´objects ´ rat...