|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
Cox’s concept that the two factors necessary for nationalism, the state as a necessary container in which the idea of nationalism can take shape, and the economic system of capitalism which then compels material accumulation and thereby nationalism, is a apt analysis. A state is able to provide structure and stability in which individuals are able to find differences and likeness with other individuals in that state. These groupings can occur on a large or small scale, i.e. a government proposed graduated tax cut may garner little national attention and therefore marginal likeness between individuals while a possible war against a foreign nation will usually result in a majority of agreement among all individuals and consequently groups. The nation is responsible for detailing what similarities and differences are evident in the nation, in order to better solidify a universal feeling of nationality. These policies are enacted to negate whatever differences or variety are found in that nation. Consequently, as Cox points out, these policies may have a decidedly averse effect on that nation. In the case of colonial India during the 1930’s through the 1950’s (Cox: 2002, 177) there were large anti-colonial movements in that nation by the indignant peoples in response to policies enacted by the then British controlled imperialist government. Accordingly, the ability for a state to make policies that are able to control and maintain the population without infringing on perceived natural rights is crucial for the overall well being and further development of nationalism in that state.
Approximate Word count = 857
Approximate Pages = 3.4
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|