|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 116 S.Ct. 1589 (1996)
Statement of Case
On 1996, a BMW purchaser sued after discovering that his new BMW had been repainted prior to sale, alleging that the failure to disclosure the repainting constituted fraud under Alabama law. ... BMW appeals the verdict, and the Alabama Supreme Court cut the award to $2 million. ... S. ... Gore, a doctor in Oncology in Birmingham (Alabama) bought a new BMW 535. ...
2: BMW said that due to “acid rain” contamination, the car paint had a superficial damage before arrived in the U.S and due that, the car’s paint was refinished and then it was returned to a factory quality at BMW import facility in the USA, that use the same equipment that they have in Germany. ... Gore (the plaintiff) alleged that he had suffered $4,000 in actual damages,
relying on the testimony of a former BMW dealer who estimated that the value of a repainted BMW was approximately 10% less than one that was “showroom new”.
Approximate Word count = 786
Approximate Pages = 3.1
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|