|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
O Sifuni Mungu I liked this critique paper because I got to compare the same version of a song, but with two different interpretations. It was interesting to hear how each director made the song his or her own. I found them both pleasing to listen to, both for the style they each put into the piece, and the way it was presented. The first interpretation of “O Sifuni Mungu” I liked very much. This piece I felt from the very beginning was very solid. The notes and harmonies, with the chorus as a whole, were smooth and there weren’t many audible dissonances. One of the first things that I noticed and enjoyed about this piece was that there seemed to be a lot going on all the time. They had variations before the song actually started that included stomping their feet, clapping their hands, and even making bird calls and other animal noises. You could hear the audience laughing at this, which I thought was amusing. The first few soloists I think may have been slightly tone deaf, but I commend them on the personalization put into their solos. The second soloist messed up on the words, too.
Approximate Word count = 764
Approximate Pages = 3.1
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|