|
|
This is only a preview of the paper
Click here to register and get the full text.
Existing members click here to login
|
|
|
Since the beginning of time until the modern day and age, male and female minds have been clashing. It is obvious that both genders have different mind sets, and the struggle of each has a different way of dealing. Why is this though? Sex, dominance, and control of the dominance have definitely been factors in how this works. Often, women insist they don't like competition, and that competition is an act of aggression. Ironically, however, competition as aggression is inevitable in a society where men must compete for the attention of women. Women encourage this. Every time they passively wait for men to take the initiative, or reject nurturing men in deference to dominant men, they are also acting in an aggressive. Ignoring this, pop-feminists contend competition is the capitalization of aggression, and men do it to the detriment of all. Does this mean fighting for domination is the only way to compete--that competition is solely a male socialization and is something we can do without? Male socialization has nothing to do with it. In one way or another, all living things compete, because wanting creates competition. You want to live, so you offer goods or services to others in exchange for the goods and services you need to survive. The better the goods and services you offer, the more you can get in exchange, and the better you will be able to live. To live well, you make your surroundings as good as possible relative to what your 'competition' offers. That is the essence of competition in a free market. It respects the rights of others, and everybody wins because it works through validation rather than domination.
Approximate Word count = 1076
Approximate Pages = 4.3
(250 words per page double spaced)
|
|
|
|
|
|